554 words
3 minutes
Spin-Orbit Interaction as a 2×2 Spinor Operator

Spin-orbit coupling is responsible for the fine structure of hydrogen and plays a central role in atomic physics, relativistic corrections, and condensed matter (topological insulators, Rashba effect). The interaction Hamiltonian is

WS−O=e28πϵ0me2c2R3 L⃗⋅S⃗W_{S-O} = \frac{e^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0 m_e^2 c^2 R^3}\, \vec{L} \cdot \vec{S}

where RR is the (operator) magnitude of the electron’s position, L⃗\vec{L} is the orbital angular momentum, and S⃗\vec{S} is the spin. The goal here is to write this out explicitly as a 2×22 \times 2 matrix operator acting on spinors, using the SzS_z eigenstates ∣+⟩,∣−⟩|{+}\rangle, |{-}\rangle as a basis.


Part 1: Decomposing L⃗⋅S⃗\vec{L} \cdot \vec{S} with ladder operators#

Define the raising and lowering operators in the usual way:

L±≡Lx±iLy,S±≡Sx±iSyL_\pm \equiv L_x \pm i L_y, \qquad S_\pm \equiv S_x \pm i S_y

Claim: L⃗⋅S⃗=12(S+L−+S−L+)+LzSz\vec{L} \cdot \vec{S} = \frac{1}{2}(S_+ L_- + S_- L_+) + L_z S_z

Proof (going right to left):

12(S+L−+S−L+)+LzSz\frac{1}{2}(S_+ L_- + S_- L_+) + L_z S_z

=12((Sx+iSy)(Lx−iLy)+(Sx−iSy)(Lx+iLy))+LzSz= \frac{1}{2}\Big((S_x + iS_y)(L_x - iL_y) + (S_x - iS_y)(L_x + iL_y)\Big) + L_z S_z

Expanding the brackets:

=12(SxLx−iSxLy+iSyLx+SyLy+SxLx+iSxLy−iSyLx+SyLy)+LzSz= \frac{1}{2}\Big(S_x L_x - iS_x L_y + iS_y L_x + S_y L_y + S_x L_x + iS_x L_y - iS_y L_x + S_y L_y\Big) + L_z S_z

The imaginary cross-terms cancel:

=12(2SxLx+2SyLy)+LzSz=SxLx+SyLy+SzLz=S⃗⋅L⃗■= \frac{1}{2}\Big(2S_x L_x + 2S_y L_y\Big) + L_z S_z = S_x L_x + S_y L_y + S_z L_z = \vec{S} \cdot \vec{L} \quad \blacksquare

This decomposition is useful because S±S_\pm act simply on spin-12\frac{1}{2} states, while L±L_\pm act on the orbital part — the two spaces never mix, so we can handle them separately.


Part 2: The explicit 2×22 \times 2 matrix#

For a spin-12\frac{1}{2} electron, Sx=ℏ2σxS_x = \frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_x and Sy=ℏ2σyS_y = \frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_y in terms of Pauli matrices. Computing S±S_\pm explicitly:

S+=Sx+iSy=ℏ2(0110)+i⋅ℏ2(0−ii0)=ℏ2(0200)=ℏ(0100)S_+ = S_x + iS_y = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix} + i\cdot\frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i\\i & 0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 2\\0 & 0\end{pmatrix} = \hbar\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\0 & 0\end{pmatrix}

S−=Sx−iSy=ℏ(0010)S_- = S_x - iS_y = \hbar\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0\\1 & 0\end{pmatrix}

And Sz=ℏ2(100−1)S_z = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{pmatrix}.

Now substitute into the ladder decomposition. The three terms become 2×22\times 2 matrices whose entries are orbital operators (acting on the spatial wavefunction):

12S+L−=ℏ2(0L−00),12S−L+=ℏ2(00L+0),LzSz=ℏ2(Lz00−Lz)\frac{1}{2}S_+ L_- = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & L_-\\0 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \frac{1}{2}S_- L_+ = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0\\L_+ & 0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad L_z S_z = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}L_z & 0\\0 & -L_z\end{pmatrix}

Adding them:

L⃗⋅S⃗=ℏ2(LzL−L+−Lz)\vec{L} \cdot \vec{S} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}L_z & L_-\\L_+ & -L_z\end{pmatrix}

Plugging back into WS−OW_{S-O}:

WS−O=e28πϵ0me2c2 ℏ2(Lz/R3L−/R3L+/R3−Lz/R3)\boxed{W_{S-O} = \frac{e^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0 m_e^2 c^2}\,\frac{\hbar}{2} \begin{pmatrix}L_z/R^3 & L_-/R^3\\L_+/R^3 & -L_z/R^3\end{pmatrix}}


Reading the matrix#

The structure of this matrix is worth pausing on:

  • Diagonal entries (Lz/R3L_z/R^3 and −Lz/R3-L_z/R^3): these connect spin-up to spin-up and spin-down to spin-down. They give an energy contribution proportional to mlmsm_l m_s — the projection of L⃗\vec{L} along zz, weighted by whether the spin is up or down. On their own they are not the physical splitting: the eigenvalues of the full matrix (diagonal plus off-diagonal) depend only on jj, not on mjm_j, as rotational invariance demands. What spin-orbit coupling actually splits is the j=l+12j = l + \tfrac{1}{2} multiplet from the j=l−12j = l - \tfrac{1}{2} multiplet, via L⃗⋅S⃗=ℏ22[j(j+1)−l(l+1)−34]\vec{L}\cdot\vec{S} = \tfrac{\hbar^2}{2}\left[j(j+1) - l(l+1) - \tfrac{3}{4}\right].

  • Off-diagonal entries (L±/R3L_\pm/R^3): these flip the spin while simultaneously changing mlm_l by ∓1\mp 1, conserving mj=ml+msm_j = m_l + m_s. They are responsible for mixing spatial and spin degrees of freedom, and are why mlm_l and msm_s individually are not good quantum numbers in the presence of spin-orbit coupling — only jj and mjm_j are.

This is why the correct basis for hydrogen fine structure is ∣n,l,j,mj⟩|n, l, j, m_j\rangle rather than ∣n,l,ml,ms⟩|n, l, m_l, m_s\rangle.

Spin-Orbit Interaction as a 2×2 Spinor Operator
https://rohankulkarni.me/posts/notes/spin-orbit-interaction/
Author
Rohan Kulkarni
Published at
2023-07-20
License
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Share Post
Comments