The correlation function C ( t ) C(t) C ( t ) is the overlap of a state with its own time-evolved self, so it tells you how quickly a quantum state moves away from where it started. In this post I compute it for a state built as a superposition of energy eigenstates with a Gaussian distribution of energies. What comes out at the end is a very concrete version of the energy-time uncertainty relation.
The setup# Suppose you have prepared a state ∣ α ⟩ |\alpha\rangle ∣ α ⟩ as a superposition of N N N energy eigenstates ∣ w k ⟩ |w_k\rangle ∣ w k ⟩ with a mean energy ω 0 \omega_0 ω 0 and a width σ ω \sigma_\omega σ ω :
c k ∝ e − ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 2 σ ω 2 c_k \propto e^{-\frac{(\omega_k - \omega_0)^2}{2\sigma_\omega^2}} c k ∝ e − 2 σ ω 2 ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 ∣ α ⟩ = ∑ k c k ∣ w k ⟩ |\alpha\rangle = \sum_k c_k |w_k\rangle ∣ α ⟩ = k ∑ c k ∣ w k ⟩ We want the normalized state and the correlation amplitude C ( t ) = ⟨ α ∣ U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ C(t) = \langle \alpha | U(t) | \alpha \rangle C ( t ) = ⟨ α ∣ U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ .
Normalization# To normalize the state, we require ⟨ α ∣ α ⟩ = 1 \langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle = 1 ⟨ α ∣ α ⟩ = 1 :
⟨ α ∣ α ⟩ = ∑ k , l c k ∗ c l ⟨ w k ∣ w l ⟩ = ∑ k ∣ c k ∣ 2 = 1 \langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle = \sum_{k,l} c_k^* c_l \langle w_k | w_l \rangle = \sum_k |c_k|^2 = 1 ⟨ α ∣ α ⟩ = k , l ∑ c k ∗ c l ⟨ w k ∣ w l ⟩ = k ∑ ∣ c k ∣ 2 = 1 Given the proportionality c k = A e − ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 2 σ ω 2 c_k = A e^{-\frac{(\omega_k - \omega_0)^2}{2\sigma_\omega^2}} c k = A e − 2 σ ω 2 ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 , we find the normalization constant A A A :
A = 1 ∑ k e − ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 σ ω 2 A = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sum_k e^{-\frac{(\omega_k - \omega_0)^2}{\sigma_\omega^2}}}} A = ∑ k e − σ ω 2 ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 1
The Correlation Function# The time evolution operator is U ( t ) = e − i H t / ℏ U(t) = e^{-iHt/\hbar} U ( t ) = e − i H t /ℏ . Acting on the state ∣ α ⟩ |\alpha\rangle ∣ α ⟩ :
U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ = ∑ k c k e − i ω k t ∣ w k ⟩ U(t) |\alpha\rangle = \sum_k c_k e^{-i\omega_k t} |w_k\rangle U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ = k ∑ c k e − i ω k t ∣ w k ⟩ The correlation function C ( t ) C(t) C ( t ) is defined as the overlap between the initial state and the state at time t t t :
C ( t ) = ⟨ α ∣ U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ = ∑ k ∣ c k ∣ 2 e − i ω k t C(t) = \langle \alpha | U(t) | \alpha \rangle = \sum_k |c_k|^2 e^{-i\omega_k t} C ( t ) = ⟨ α ∣ U ( t ) ∣ α ⟩ = k ∑ ∣ c k ∣ 2 e − i ω k t Using the normalization and the Gaussian coefficients:
C ( t ) = ∑ k e − ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 σ ω 2 e − i ω k t ∑ k e − ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 σ ω 2 C(t) = \frac{\sum_k e^{-\frac{(\omega_k - \omega_0)^2}{\sigma_\omega^2}} e^{-i\omega_k t}}{\sum_k e^{-\frac{(\omega_k - \omega_0)^2}{\sigma_\omega^2}}} C ( t ) = ∑ k e − σ ω 2 ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 ∑ k e − σ ω 2 ( ω k − ω 0 ) 2 e − i ω k t
Classical Limit# In the limit of a large number of states (N → ∞ N \to \infty N → ∞ ) and small spacing, we can approximate the sum as an integral:
C ( t ) ≈ ∫ e − ( ω − ω 0 ) 2 σ ω 2 e − i ω t d ω ∫ e − ( ω − ω 0 ) 2 σ ω 2 d ω C(t) \approx \frac{\int e^{-\frac{(\omega - \omega_0)^2}{\sigma_\omega^2}} e^{-i\omega t} d\omega}{\int e^{-\frac{(\omega - \omega_0)^2}{\sigma_\omega^2}} d\omega} C ( t ) ≈ ∫ e − σ ω 2 ( ω − ω 0 ) 2 d ω ∫ e − σ ω 2 ( ω − ω 0 ) 2 e − iω t d ω The integral in the numerator is the Fourier transform of a Gaussian:
∫ − ∞ ∞ e − a ω 2 + b ω d ω = π a e b 2 / 4 a \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a\omega^2 + b\omega} d\omega = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}} e^{b^2/4a} ∫ − ∞ ∞ e − a ω 2 + bω d ω = a π e b 2 /4 a After completing the square and performing the integration, we find:
C ( t ) ≈ e − i ω 0 t e − σ ω 2 t 2 / 4 C(t) \approx e^{-i\omega_0 t} e^{-\sigma_\omega^2 t^2 / 4} C ( t ) ≈ e − i ω 0 t e − σ ω 2 t 2 /4
Interpretation# The absolute value of the correlation function, ∣ C ( t ) ∣ = e − σ ω 2 t 2 / 4 |C(t)| = e^{-\sigma_\omega^2 t^2 / 4} ∣ C ( t ) ∣ = e − σ ω 2 t 2 /4 , shows a Gaussian decay. The “correlation time” τ \tau τ can be defined as the time it takes for ∣ C ( t ) ∣ |C(t)| ∣ C ( t ) ∣ to drop to 1 / e 1/e 1/ e of its initial value:
τ = 2 σ ω \tau = \frac{2}{\sigma_\omega} τ = σ ω 2 So τ σ ω = 2 \tau \sigma_\omega = 2 τ σ ω = 2 , which is the energy-time uncertainty relation in about the most concrete form you can get. The broader the spread of energies σ ω \sigma_\omega σ ω (i.e. the less well-defined the energy, which is the more “classical” direction), the faster the state decorrelates.