579 words
3 minutes
Bose-Einstein Condensation (1): Can it occur in 1D and 2D?

Problem: Does BEC occur in 1D or 2D for free particles with periodic boundary conditions? Prove your answers with complete calculations.


Why the density of states decides everything#

Before diving into 1D and 2D, it’s worth being precise about what “BEC occurs” actually means mechanically.

In the grand canonical ensemble, the average number of particles in excited states (everything above the ground state) is:

Nex(T,μ)=∫0∞g(E)z−1eβE−1 dEN_\text{ex}(T, \mu) = \int_0^\infty \frac{g(E)}{z^{-1}e^{\beta E} - 1}\, dE

where g(E)g(E) is the density of states, β=1/kBT\beta = 1/k_BT, and z=eβμz = e^{\beta\mu} is the fugacity with μ≤0\mu \leq 0 for bosons.

The fugacity is bounded: z∈[0,1)z \in [0, 1), with z→1z \to 1 corresponding to μ→0−\mu \to 0^- (the low-temperature limit). So the maximum number of particles that excited states can accommodate at temperature TT is:

Nexmax(T)=lim⁡z→1∫0∞g(E)eβE−1 dEN_\text{ex}^\text{max}(T) = \lim_{z\to 1} \int_0^\infty \frac{g(E)}{e^{\beta E} - 1}\, dE

BEC occurs if and only if Nexmax(T)N_\text{ex}^\text{max}(T) is finite. If it’s finite, then for N>NexmaxN > N_\text{ex}^\text{max} the excess particles must pile up in the ground state — that’s the condensate. If the integral diverges, excited states can absorb any number of particles at any temperature, and there’s never any need for macroscopic ground state occupation.

Everything comes down to whether this integral converges at z=1z = 1.


Density of states in dd dimensions#

For free particles in a dd-dimensional box of side LL with periodic boundary conditions, the allowed wavevectors are ki=2πni/Lk_i = 2\pi n_i / L and the energy is E=ℏ2k2/2mE = \hbar^2 k^2 / 2m. Converting the sum over states to an integral in the thermodynamic limit:

∑n⃗⟶Ld(2π)d∫ddk=V(2π)d⋅Sd∫0∞kd−1 dk\sum_{\vec{n}} \longrightarrow \frac{L^d}{(2\pi)^d} \int d^d k = \frac{V}{(2\pi)^d} \cdot S_d \int_0^\infty k^{d-1}\, dk

where SdS_d is the surface area of a unit sphere in dd dimensions (S1=2S_1 = 2, S2=2πS_2 = 2\pi, S3=4πS_3 = 4\pi). Changing variables k→Ek \to E using E=ℏ2k2/2mE = \hbar^2 k^2/2m:

k=2mEℏ2,dk=m2ℏ2E dEk = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}}, \qquad dk = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2\hbar^2 E}}\, dE

so kd−1 dk∝Ed/2−1 dEk^{d-1}\,dk \propto E^{d/2 - 1}\,dE, giving:

g(E)∝Ed/2−1\boxed{g(E) \propto E^{d/2 - 1}}

This single formula tells the whole story:

  • 3D: g(E)∝E1/2g(E) \propto E^{1/2} — grows with energy
  • 2D: g(E)∝E0g(E) \propto E^0 — constant
  • 1D: g(E)∝E−1/2g(E) \propto E^{-1/2} — diverges as E→0E \to 0

2D: the integral diverges logarithmically#

The explicit 2D density of states (for spin-0 bosons, V=L2V = L^2):

g2D(E)=Vm2πℏ2g_{2D}(E) = \frac{Vm}{2\pi\hbar^2}

Now check whether NexmaxN_\text{ex}^\text{max} is finite:

Nexmax=Vm2πℏ2∫0∞dEeβE−1N_\text{ex}^\text{max} = \frac{Vm}{2\pi\hbar^2} \int_0^\infty \frac{dE}{e^{\beta E} - 1}

Near E=0E = 0, the Bose-Einstein factor behaves as 1eβE−1≈1βE\frac{1}{e^{\beta E}-1} \approx \frac{1}{\beta E}, so the integrand goes as ∼1/E\sim 1/E. This gives a logarithmic divergence at the lower limit:

∫0∞dEeβE−1∼∫0ϵdEβE=1βln⁡(ϵ)∣0→∞\int_0^\infty \frac{dE}{e^{\beta E} - 1} \sim \int_0^\epsilon \frac{dE}{\beta E} = \frac{1}{\beta}\ln(\epsilon)\Big|_0 \to \infty

Nexmax=∞N_\text{ex}^\text{max} = \infty — excited states can accommodate infinitely many particles at any finite temperature. BEC does not occur in 2D.


1D: the integral diverges even faster#

In 1D:

g1D(E)=Lπℏm2E∝E−1/2g_{1D}(E) = \frac{L}{\pi\hbar}\sqrt{\frac{m}{2E}} \propto E^{-1/2}

The integral becomes:

Nexmax∝∫0∞E−1/2eβE−1 dEN_\text{ex}^\text{max} \propto \int_0^\infty \frac{E^{-1/2}}{e^{\beta E} - 1}\, dE

Near E=0E = 0, the integrand behaves as ∼E−1/2⋅1βE=1βE−3/2\sim E^{-1/2} \cdot \frac{1}{\beta E} = \frac{1}{\beta} E^{-3/2}, which diverges faster than in 2D:

∫0ϵE−3/2 dE=[−2E−1/2]0ϵ→∞\int_0^\epsilon E^{-3/2}\, dE = \left[-2E^{-1/2}\right]_0^\epsilon \to \infty

BEC does not occur in 1D either — and the failure is even more severe than in 2D.


Summary#

Dimensiong(E)g(E)Integral at z=1z=1BEC?
1D∝E−1/2\propto E^{-1/2}Diverges as E−3/2E^{-3/2}✗
2DconstantDiverges as E−1E^{-1}✗
3D∝E1/2\propto E^{1/2}Converges✓

In 3D, g(E)∝Eg(E) \propto \sqrt{E} suppresses the integrand enough near E=0E = 0 that NexmaxN_\text{ex}^\text{max} is finite — which is precisely why BEC happens in 3D and not in lower dimensions.

This is a general result: for a dd-dimensional ideal Bose gas, BEC requires d>2d > 2. The borderline case d=2d = 2 is marginal (logarithmically divergent), which is why 2D systems show a different but related phase transition — the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition — but that’s a story for another post.

Bose-Einstein Condensation (1): Can it occur in 1D and 2D?
https://rohankulkarni.me/posts/notes/bec-1d-2d/
Author
Rohan Kulkarni
Published at
2024-05-24
License
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Share Post
Comments