Problem: Does BEC occur in 1D or 2D for free particles with periodic boundary conditions? Prove your answers with complete calculations.
Why the density of states decides everything
Before diving into 1D and 2D, it’s worth being precise about what “BEC occurs” actually means mechanically.
In the grand canonical ensemble, the average number of particles in excited states (everything above the ground state) is:
where is the density of states, , and is the fugacity with for bosons.
The fugacity is bounded: , with corresponding to (the low-temperature limit). So the maximum number of particles that excited states can accommodate at temperature is:
BEC occurs if and only if is finite. If it’s finite, then for the excess particles must pile up in the ground state — that’s the condensate. If the integral diverges, excited states can absorb any number of particles at any temperature, and there’s never any need for macroscopic ground state occupation.
Everything comes down to whether this integral converges at .
Density of states in dimensions
For free particles in a -dimensional box of side with periodic boundary conditions, the allowed wavevectors are and the energy is . Converting the sum over states to an integral in the thermodynamic limit:
where is the surface area of a unit sphere in dimensions (, , ). Changing variables using :
so , giving:
This single formula tells the whole story:
- 3D: — grows with energy
- 2D: — constant
- 1D: — diverges as
2D: the integral diverges logarithmically
The explicit 2D density of states (for spin-0 bosons, ):
Now check whether is finite:
Near , the Bose-Einstein factor behaves as , so the integrand goes as . This gives a logarithmic divergence at the lower limit:
— excited states can accommodate infinitely many particles at any finite temperature. BEC does not occur in 2D.
1D: the integral diverges even faster
In 1D:
The integral becomes:
Near , the integrand behaves as , which diverges faster than in 2D:
BEC does not occur in 1D either — and the failure is even more severe than in 2D.
Summary
| Dimension | Integral at | BEC? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | Diverges as | ✗ | |
| 2D | constant | Diverges as | ✗ |
| 3D | Converges | ✓ |
In 3D, suppresses the integrand enough near that is finite — which is precisely why BEC happens in 3D and not in lower dimensions.
This is a general result: for a -dimensional ideal Bose gas, BEC requires . The borderline case is marginal (logarithmically divergent), which is why 2D systems show a different but related phase transition — the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition — but that’s a story for another post.